Pages

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Look beyond treatment-Uganda scientists on US antimalarial drug quality study

By Esther Nakkazi

This week the US published a report from a study on the quality of anti-malarial drugs in Uganda and other African countries.

But Uganda scientists have different opinions saying although the study was good and relevant, there are more pressing problems with malaria, which kills at least 300 people, per day, mostly children under five years and pregnant women in Uganda.

Some Uganda scientists think the study was a 'commercial ploy’ by the malaria industry but all agree there is a bigger problem than impure drugs. They pointed out that the resistance problem for malaria drugs is more of a bad consumer behaviour problem rather than purity of drugs.

In Uganda, drug resistance is manifested because many people misuse drugs properly rather than taking low quality anti-malarials. Dr. Myers Lugemwa, officer in charge of malaria research at the ministry of Health said even if it sounds like common sense but the fastidious behavior of patients  probably caused by ignorance and cultural beliefs brings about drug resistance.

He said many patients seeking treatment have cheeky behaviors like ceasing to take medicines when they feel better and sharing medicines with neighbors and friends.

So for Uganda and many other countries the issue of quality of drugs is not a primary concern but accessibility.

“We are only taking what is available, we can not just have people die because the drugs are not good quality. We have tested them and found them effective,” said Dr. Lugemwa.

National Drug Authority (NDA), the Uganda regulatory body officials said they test all the drugs that come to the market and they are dealing with counterfeits on the market but the laboratories are registering a downward trend in quality testing failure over the past decade.

“There has been a drop in drug failure rate in our laboratories over the last 10 years. But there are problems with consumers due to self medication, incomplete doses and as a result drugs become ineffective,” said Fredrick Ssekyana, the spokesperson for Uganda National Drug Authority (NDA).

The reactions follow the release of a report that said that the most effective type of malaria-fighting drugs sold in three African countries including Uganda are often of poor quality, raising fears of increased drug resistance.

Between 16 per cent and 40 per cent of artemisinin-based drugs sold in Senegal, Madagascar and Uganda failed quality testing, for reasons including impurities or not containing enough active ingredient, the survey found.

'I am alarmed by these results because it means there are many cases of malaria that are being only partially treated, and that just guarantees acceleration of artemisinin drug resistance.'— Rachel Nugent, Centre for Global Development

The study was the first part of a 10-country examination of antimalarials in Africa by the U.S. and the World Health Organization.

Artemisinin-based drugs are the only affordable treatment for malaria left in the global medicine cabinet. Other drugs have already lost effectiveness due to resistance, which builds when not enough medicine is taken to kill all of the mosquito-transmitted parasites.

If artemisinin-based drugs stop working, there is no good replacement and experts worry many people could die.

"It is worrisome that almost all of the poor-quality data that was obtained was a result of inadequate amounts of active [ingredients] or the presence of impurities in the product," said Patrick Lukulay, director of a nongovernmental U.S. Pharmacopeia program funded by the U.S. government, which conducted the survey. "This is a disturbing trend that came to light."

NDA officials said they also have a problem with increasing drug counterfeits on the market, which is a global evil, but it is working with Interpol to curb the vice.

“We have people who change expiry dates, drug labels and even make pills using cassava flour,” said Ssekyana.

The three-country report also found bad drugs in both the public and private health sectors, meaning governments — some buying medicines with donor funds — are not doing enough to keep poor-quality pills out.

All of the drugs tested from the public sector in Uganda, however, passed the quality tests. But 40 per cent of the artemisinin-based drugs in Senegal failed.

"There are countries where donated medicines are not subjected to quality controls, they're just accepted," said Lukulay. "There are countries in Africa where Chinese products have been donated and found to be unacceptable later in the public sector."

Donations come in during epidemics or seasonal disease outbreaks, simultaneously and generously, and they are accepted by non-governmental and faith-based organizations unconditionally, according to NDA officials.

“We urge that the donations are subject to the same tests but we usually re-export or destroy them and the costs are borne by those who donate them,” said Victoria Birungi Kwesiga, inspector of drugs at NDA.

Nearly 200 samples underwent full quality control testing in a U.S. laboratory to examine the amount of active ingredient present and drug purity. For both drugs, 44 per cent from Senegal failed the full quality testing, followed by 30 per cent from Madagascar and 26 per cent from Uganda.

“I think this is a commercial ploy to discredit other drug companies super ceding others,” said a pharmacist in Wandegeya a suburb in Uganda.

“They should look beyond treatment to prevention. Recently I heard in the media that Uganda mosquitoes are resistant to DDT, they should focus on the parasite,” said Rhona Nankya a nurse in Kampala.

In all three countries, the antimalarial brands collected from various areas and sectors tended to either do well across the board or poorly, which could prove helpful for governments working to ban low-grade drugs.

Results from the other countries surveyed — Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Tanzania — have not yet been publicly released by the WHO.

Ends-

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Celebrating Two Decades of Groundbreaking HIV Research: MRC/UVRI’s Legacy

By Esther Nakkazi

On February 2nd, we marked the 20-year anniversary of the Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute (MRC/UVRI) partnership in HIV research, celebrated in Entebbe. While medical research may not seem glamorous, its importance is undeniable, especially when findings shape policies that impact millions of lives.

As a journalist, I didn’t always pay close attention to how scientific research informs policy. However, freelancing has allowed me the freedom to explore diverse angles for different publications. In 2006-2007, while writing for RealHealthNews under UK editor Robert Walgate, I learned to spotlight the policy implications of research. 

One story that stood out during that time was about male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy, based on studies conducted in Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa. Although groundbreaking, it is yet to be fully implemented as policy in Uganda.

Over the past two decades, MRC/UVRI has excelled as a multidisciplinary research hub, shaping HIV policies, guidelines, and treatment protocols in Uganda and beyond. Its contributions have even influenced international guidelines.

Cotrimoxazole: A Game-Changer

One of the unit’s pivotal studies in the 1990s demonstrated that the antibiotic cotrimoxazole (commonly known as Septrin) could cost-effectively prevent secondary infections in HIV patients with weakened immune systems. This finding transformed HIV care, leading to widespread adoption of cotrimoxazole treatment across Africa.

Today, the unit continues to push boundaries. Dr. Paula Munduri, who manages the HIV research program, is planning a new study to determine whether cotrimoxazole remains necessary for patients whose immune systems have recovered under antiretroviral therapy (ART). If proven unnecessary, this could save costs and reduce the pill burden for patients, enhancing treatment adherence. The trial, expected to start in mid-2010, has already secured funding—a testament to the unit's enduring impact.

Sustaining Research Excellence

At the anniversary celebrations, British High Commissioner Martin Shearman announced £40 million in funding to support the unit over the next decade. This investment underscores the importance of ongoing research, particularly in areas like HIV vaccine development and tackling resistance to antiretroviral drugs.

One of the most intriguing studies underway seeks to understand why a small group of people have natural immunity to HIV. These individuals, despite exposure to the virus, remain uninfected. Led by Dr. Pietro Pala as part of the International Centre for HIV Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI), the research involves analyzing samples from sero-discordant couples in Kampala, collected since 2007. Unlocking the secrets of these immune systems could pave the way for an effective HIV vaccine.

A Regional Reference Laboratory for HIV Drug Resistance

As part of the celebrations, a regional reference laboratory for monitoring HIV drug resistance was commissioned by Uganda’s Vice President, Dr. Gilbert Bukenya. This facility further cements MRC/UVRI’s role as a leader in HIV research, equipped with cutting-edge infrastructure and collaborative networks that transcend borders.

Looking Ahead

The MRC/UVRI partnership has set a gold standard for translating research into actionable policy. With robust funding, groundbreaking studies, and a focus on real-world impact, the future of HIV research looks promising. For me, this milestone anniversary isn’t just a celebration of the past—it’s an inspiration for the stories yet to be told. Next time Walgate calls, I’ll have plenty to write about.


The lab commissioned at the MRC/UVRI 20th anniversary
Ends.